<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The RDBMS God&#8230;..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dancres.org/blitzblog/2007/02/07/the-rdbms-god/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dancres.org/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dancres.org%2Fblitzblog%2F2007%2F02%2F07%2Fthe-rdbms-god%2F%23comment-&amp;seed_title=The+RDBMS+God%26%238230%3B..</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:39:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: james governor</title>
		<link>http://dancres.org/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dancres.org%2Fblitzblog%2F2007%2F02%2F07%2Fthe-rdbms-god%2F%23comment-43&amp;seed_title=The+RDBMS+God%26%238230%3B../comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>james governor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 15:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancres.org/blitzblog/2007/02/07/the-rdbms-god/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>of course RDBMS isn&#039;t suitable for everything. but as an industry we constantly embrace reductionism, before expanding out again, in waves something like evolution. hierarchical and flat file databases have their place.

i would say we should avoid seeking a new religion unless its a pantheistic one. the judeo-christian tradition makes us believe in one true god, which is quite limiting. what not have different gods, and databases, for diffferent niches? please excuse taking your point literally, but i just got off a plane so my brain may be a bit addled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course RDBMS isn&#8217;t suitable for everything. but as an industry we constantly embrace reductionism, before expanding out again, in waves something like evolution. hierarchical and flat file databases have their place.</p>
<p>i would say we should avoid seeking a new religion unless its a pantheistic one. the judeo-christian tradition makes us believe in one true god, which is quite limiting. what not have different gods, and databases, for diffferent niches? please excuse taking your point literally, but i just got off a plane so my brain may be a bit addled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerr</title>
		<link>http://dancres.org/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dancres.org%2Fblitzblog%2F2007%2F02%2F07%2Fthe-rdbms-god%2F%23comment-42&amp;seed_title=The+RDBMS+God%26%238230%3B../comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 11:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancres.org/blitzblog/2007/02/07/the-rdbms-god/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>You might want to give CouchDB a quick look to see somethign different out there.

http://couchdb.com/

It&#039;s built using erlang and designed from the ground up to be distributed.


From the Couch DB project Wiki:

What CouchDb is
    * A document database server, accessible via a RESTful XML api.
    * Ad-hoc and schema-free with a flat address space.
    * Distributed, featuring robust, incremental replication with bi-directional conflict detection and management.
    * Query-able and index-able, featuring a table oriented reporting engine with a simplified formula query language.

What it is not
    * A relational database.
    * A replacement for relational databases.
    * An object-oriented database. Or more specifically, meant to function as a seamless persistence layer for an OO programming language.
    * A XML/XQuery database

Distributed

CouchDb is built from the start with a consistent vision of a distributed document database system. Unlike cumbersome attempts to bolt distributed features on top of the same legacy models and databases, it is the result of careful ground-up design, engineering and integration. The document, view, security and replication models, the special purpose query language, the efficient and robust disk layout are all carefully integrated for a reliable and efficient system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to give CouchDB a quick look to see somethign different out there.</p>
<p><a href="http://couchdb.com/" rel="nofollow">http://couchdb.com/</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s built using erlang and designed from the ground up to be distributed.</p>
<p>From the Couch DB project Wiki:</p>
<p>What CouchDb is<br />
    * A document database server, accessible via a RESTful XML api.<br />
    * Ad-hoc and schema-free with a flat address space.<br />
    * Distributed, featuring robust, incremental replication with bi-directional conflict detection and management.<br />
    * Query-able and index-able, featuring a table oriented reporting engine with a simplified formula query language.</p>
<p>What it is not<br />
    * A relational database.<br />
    * A replacement for relational databases.<br />
    * An object-oriented database. Or more specifically, meant to function as a seamless persistence layer for an OO programming language.<br />
    * A XML/XQuery database</p>
<p>Distributed</p>
<p>CouchDb is built from the start with a consistent vision of a distributed document database system. Unlike cumbersome attempts to bolt distributed features on top of the same legacy models and databases, it is the result of careful ground-up design, engineering and integration. The document, view, security and replication models, the special purpose query language, the efficient and robust disk layout are all carefully integrated for a reliable and efficient system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
